Abort73.com > The Case Against Abortion > Abortion Pictures

Abortion Pictures

Abortion is an act of violence against an innocent human being.

Page Summary:

There is simply no way to accurately comprehend the barbarity of abortion without being exposed to the photographic evidence which so clearly demonstrates that abortion is a brutal act of violence.

Some people argue that abortion is an act of mercy, an expression of love to a child who would otherwise be forced to endure a life of unwantedness. Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in the United States. Their founder, Margaret Sanger, once said, "the most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."1 The question before us, then, is this. Is abortion an act of mercy or an act of violence? While it may be easy to casually maintain support for abortion in the abstract, it becomes much harder when the evidence is put before us.

Though pictures of aborted embryos and fetuses are shocking, they are no more shocking than the act of abortion itself. Until you see what abortion does, it is difficult to grasp how violent abortion is. Pictures take the mask off, just as they have for other injustices in modern history. Referring to the horrific lynching of 14-year-old Emmett Till and the subsequent photos published in a 1955 issue of Jet magazine, Reverend Al Sharpton remarks:

People can sort of deal with things they don't have to look at, but it's hard to view a corpse and turn your head... And that's why generations unborn owe [Emmett's mom] a lot, because she was able to graphically bring home what a thousand speeches couldn't bring home... The easiest thing would have been to say, "No, close the casket, I can't bear it." But she somehow found the strength to say, "I'll bear my pain, to save some other mother from having to go through this."  And because she put the picture of this young man's body on the conscience of America, she might have saved thousands of young black men and young black women's lives.2

POST-ABORTION PHOTOGRAPHS (click images to enlarge)

Abortion Picture - 7 Weeks From Fertilization
Abortion Picture - 8 Weeks From Fertilization
Abortion Picture - 9 Weeks From Fertilization
Abortion Picture - 10 Weeks From Fertilization
Abortion Picture - 11 Weeks From Fertilization
Abortion Picture - 24 Weeks From Fertilization

Copyright © The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform. All rights reserved. www.AbortionNO.org
Abort73 does not support or condone violence against abortion providers nor associate with groups that do.

The decision to unseal Emmett's  coffin was not an easy or pleasant one. Neither was holding an open-casket funeral and allowing the pictures of her mutilated son to be shown to an entire nation and world. Those photographs, however, helped create an entire generation of young activists who could no longer remain apathetic towards America's racial problem.

The photographs on this page are equally unpleasant, but as Reverend Sharpton points out, "People can sort of deal with things they don't have to look at." Day after day, thousands of tiny human beings are quietly destroyed behind sterile clinic doors. Abortion pictures graphically bring home what a thousand speeches can't. Naomi Wolf, one of the most celebrated feminists of the modern era and an ardent abortion supporter, questions anyone who is willing to support abortion without also having the stomach to face its violent reality. She says it this way:

How can we charge that it is vile and repulsive for pro-lifers to brandish vile and repulsive images if the images are real? To insist that the truth is in poor taste is the very height of hypocrisy. Besides, if these images are often the facts of the matter, and if we then claim that it is offensive for pro-choice women to be confronted by them, then we are making the judgment that women are too inherently weak to face a truth about which they have to make a grave decision. This view of women is unworthy of feminism.3

Naomi Wolfe notwithstanding, abortion-rights advocates often complain that the abortion pictures in circulation today do not accurately reflect most abortion procedures. This assertion is true but misleading. Well over half of the abortions performed in the United States occur prior to seven weeks (9 weeks LMP4). The reason you so rarely see abortion pictures prior to seven weeks is because embryos who are killed before this point are so small and the violence so intense that they are destroyed beyond recognition. They are completely obliterated. This does not mean the procedure is more benign than it would have been later in pregnancy; it just means the destruction is so thorough that there is nothing left to take a picture of.

Of course, even when the early embryo is still whole, few cameras have the ability to get a good picture. The National Abortion Federation (NAF) reports that the embryo is so small at first heartbeat (21 days postconception) that it "predates the ability to image it."5 The NAF goes on to say that the "absence of cardiac activity in an embryo measuring greater then 3.5 mm in its longest axis had 100% positive predictive value for embryonic demise."6 These are incredibly small human beings we are talking about, but their diminutive size is not for a lack of complex development. The heart starts beating after three weeks, followed by the appearance of the hands, feet, eyes, and nose in week four. The embryo doubles in size during week five, but still only measures 10 millimeters. When these tiny bodies meet the overwhelming force of suction curettage, it is no wonder that nothing is recognizable when the cannula is emptied–which is why abortion pictures of older embryos and fetuses are so important. The violence from one procedure to the next is the same. It is only because we can better recognize the "products of conception" in later abortions that they seem so much more shocking. Do not be fooled. The violence of later abortions actually does comparatively less bodily harm to the fetus than an earlier abortion does the embryo. And if you still maintain there is a moral difference between an earlier abortion and a later abortion, consider the fact the abortion industry makes no such distinction. The NAF trains their abortionists to not raise moral objections, no matter when or why the abortion is performed.

This page was last updated on September 22, 2014. To cite this page in a research paper, visit: "Citing Abort73 as a Source."

    Footnotes

  1. Margaret Sanger. “The Wickedness of Creating Large Families,” Woman and the New Race. 1920 (http://www.bartleby.com/1013/5.html).
  2. Al Sharpton, The Untold Story of Emmett Louis Till. Dir. Keith A. Beauchamp. ThinkFilm. 2005. Film.
  3. Naomi Wolf, “Our Bodies, Our Souls,” The New Republic, October 16, 1995, 32.
  4. Gestational weeks are measured from the first day of the woman’s last menstruation (LMP) and not from the day of conception. Though it does not provide an accurate fetal age (which is roughly 2 weeks less than the gestational age), it is the simplest way for an OB/GYN to age a pregnancy since the day of conception is often not known. The images on our Prenatal Development and Abortion Pictures pages are more precisely captioned with fetal ages in accordance with standard teaching texts on prenatal development.
  5. Steven R. Goldstein, MD and Matthew F. Reeves, MD, MPH, “Clinical Assessment and Ultrasound in Early Pregnancy,” Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy. Ed. Paul, Lichtenberg, Borgatta, Grimes, Stubblefield and Creinin. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), 63.
  6. Ibid.
  7.  

Possible Objection:

Abortion is a horrible thing and I would never have one, but that doesn't give me the right to tell other people what they can or cannot do.

To learn our response, continue to the next page: The Role of Law

Related Entries:

For Further Study:

Let Us Know What You Think:

  • Facebook Comments
  • Site Comments

16 Comments on Abortion Pictures

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (Jul 16, 2012 / 11:35 CST)

I realize these are difficult to look at - which really should make us think. If this is a good, important, acceptable “choice” for women to make, why are we so hysterical anytime we see these types of pictures? The horror they evoke is what makes them powerful.
I was pro-choice until I saw pictures like these and realized I had been lied to about “clumps of cells” and “it’s not a baby”. At some point we ALL looked like this. We were the same human being at that point as we are now. The only thing that has changed is our age. And all of the bumper sticker slogans (My body, my choice.” “Keep your rosaries off my ovaries.” “Don’t like abortion, don’t have one.”, etc.) will not change the fact that this is not a women’s rights issue - it is a HUMAN rights issue. And I will continue to speak out about it - loudly, frequently, and at every opportunity.

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (Mar 28, 2011 / 10:36 CST)

I hope and pray that we are able to slam this door shut. It appears that the statistics are beginning to swing in that direction a bit. Perhaps, this is something that is new people would like to know from world news for these days. 
купить спайс в Омске

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (Mar 05, 2011 / 20:05 CST)

I am outraged that anti abortion activists feel that it is ok to show graphic pictures via curbside. I myself am against abortion however, as a mother it is up to me to decide what is appropriate for my child~ example:Movies have parental guidance warnings on them(IT IS UP TO ME) as a parent to filter what I feel maybe harmful yet I can no longer drive down a public street without fear that my child may be exposed to horrific pictures of dead babies ~thank you for practicing your rights while taking mine away!!!

Click here to read the rest or add your own...

Abort73 Shirts:

Live & Let Live

Abort73 Promo Cards:

Life is Rad

Abort73 Pens:

Abort73 Pens

Abort73 Web Graphics:

Abort73 (Huskies)

Downloadable Flyers:

Life is Rad